I would like to see Lynn if the stuff you guys worked on was giving him a bit more power. His stats are not showing it as of now, however I have not seen him swing for about four years now. His former teacher did teach a little bit different pattern than the one the guys are know for.
I know mine is too. Most of my players start off as hitters.
Good to see TGM getting such nice coverage.

Components
 

What would be the 12-17 component variations from the Plummer-Bennett article(s)?

Just got my Golf Digest with the Plummer Bennett stuff in it. First of all FANTASTIC to see that the give credit to The Golfing Machine. Second observation is that if you take the swing that David "Master of Chapter 10" Orr has posted . . . looks just like what they have going on in the comparison of "Stack & Tilt" vs. Conventional.

I think there is definitely something to the way they advise using the ground. Also, the whole centered head controlling low point . . . 1-L #1 . . . Holla fo' a dollah or even a couple of million $$$.

They need to be on this site . . . would love to have a Machine discussion with these guys. This dealie is very much pivot based. I would like to hear them comment on pressure points and release motions. Love the business model too . . . Starski and Hutch'n it.

You could line up a bunch of guys.. Jodie Mudd, Mike Woodson, Denver Haddix and about half the top amateurs in the state of Kentucky and they would all look the same. Mac did a good job. Quick story.... Andy P called Mac one night and had a list of 11 swing questions he wanted to go over with him. Three hours later and he was only through 3 questions. :)

just fyi,i dont think these guys are teaching the way homer wanted it taught.yes their info is in the book but it is not the most acceptable way.if you dont believe me then why do they not teach putting the right forearm on plane at address?too many extra moves in their model to be a truly great ball striker.a hand controlled pivot is far superior.i have tried it all in 25 years and nobody i mean nobody understands mr.kellys teachings better than lynn blake,rob noel,ted fort,jeff hull and a selective few.sorry to step on anyones toes but the truth will come to the forefront sooner than later.

I hastened here somewhat embarassed by a protracted absense, but a nagging panic ruled the evening after I picked up my Golf Digest.

For the the short version (for me), I am enthused that Homer Kelley's teachings are receiving a richly deserved dose of notoriety. Yet, what I think I saw were some constructs which are going to be disruptive for the average golfer. Consistently for me, any deviation from proper care in building and aligning the power package increases risk of fouling the Hinge or Plane.

I have it in the back of mind that handing the average Golf Digest reader a pivot based swing, with an active #4 Accumulator, and an instruction to "stand up" is a 3 ingredient recipe for them to come off of a solid commitment to the Line. It takes the cognitive focus out of the educated hands.

I can see there is much positive in their "swing". I do look forward to hearing the LBG masters' analysis.

PS.... The denotation of "cult' died a long time ago. The resonance of its connotation remains... likened to midnight showings of "Pink Flamingos" and people who worship robins' nests. :)

AGREED!!!! I think we're headin' down the sooner part of the road too!

Gettin' Crowded
 

Bucket,

They are on this site. Just not posting. :)

Well there you go! I never did have much luck with the silent type . . . the Moooing type was more my speed.

Everybody lurks here. Listen to the mainstream talk these days. They may not be reading Homer's Book but they sure read Blake. And told a friend, who told a friend.