For The Scientists
 

It looks like we have approval to use the circle to represent the golf swing again. A couple of months ago it was dead wrong.

Unfortunately, we don't represent it properly...

Oh wait, Lynn, when you typed "ground" did you mean "ground?"

And they have the f'ing nerve to start a thread about how I don't care about my students. How I have my head buried in the sand. These idiots wear their white coats throwing shit against the wall all day long just praying something will stick. Praying their followers will believe them. Their minions clean it up off the floor thinking it's gold.

Yesterday: x is wrong, we teach y. GEEZ
Today: y is wrong, we teach x. GEEZ
Tomorrow: x is wrong again, we teach y. Can't you keep up? GEEZ

Lies and deliberate misrepresentations to further their agenda in putting TGM down.

Oh, back to the first threads intent. "Ground" They are years behind Lynn.















Sorry for the rant, somebody needs to tell the truth. Is TGM 100% correct? Of course not. Homer Kelley knew it had lot's of room to grow. Lynn Blake is filling in the blanks for me, and it works. No idiots pretending to be scientists are going to convince me otherwise. I know what I see...

TGM is 100% correct.

It's just that 99% of the people misinterpret 50% of the Book 100% of the time. 5% of the people misrepresent 50% of the Book 100% of the time.

100%? ........ wow. There's only ever been one book like that and it ain't about golf!!!!

Kev: Exhausting isn't it!?? Not who's right or wrong, but just the stuggles in general. Silly.

........... wonder what forums would look like if golf lessons were free?????? :idea1:

I give up. Just keep learning from EVERYWHERE and making who's in front of you better!!! :salut:

That's what it is supposed to be all about!!! :salut:

It's frustrating for everyone. :(

hmmm, is not sure what that says about the book?

What is the %'s for the AI's?

Hi Greg, good to see you!

I'm certain like any other walk of life there are good, bad, and everywhere in between. I'm happy we've both found those we trust!

Kevin

No different than any other book examining a complex subject. :)

I was talking about the AI's. :laughing9

Kev,

There is a saying, "you can't keep birds from flying over your head, but you sure can keep them from building a nest over your head."

Opinions are like a**holes, everyone has one. Why let someone's opinion (a**hole) detract you from your task.

Look at it this way, if you were not creating success in your little part of the world, why would you be criticized?

Words of wisdom. Thank you for that! :salut:

Kevin

Personally I think the figures that places the right shoulder as a swing center is a big discredit to TGM.

There is zero lag pressure at impact in all of those illustrations and they go against the "sustain the lag pressure".

If you start to turn the shoulders around some point between the shoulders or perhaps even lower in the spine, you suddenly have a lot of lag pressure. But then you have to move the swing center in those illustrations.

Did you mean left shoulder BerntR?

At lease you still believe in lag pressure. The scientists call it a "fairy tale."

Kevin

For most amateurs lag pressure is a fairy tale ( that is thrown away ).

Yes I mean left shoulder, KevCarter. I confuse them quite often since I play left handed and try to write everything right handed.

I don't believe in lag pressure. I know it. :salut:

I feel for you Bro, that must get very confusing sometimes! :salut:

Kevin