A Golfer Friendly Version of the Golfing Machine
 

http://www.mbgolfpros.com/golf_factory_main.html


I'm surprised I didn't find a reference to this publication of a user friendly Version of the Golfing Machine on this website? I would guess there will be much debate regarding this user friendly 14 chapter essay of Homer's book "The Golfing Machine".

Enjoy,

DG

Why would we debate? I enjoy anybody's effort in advancing the work of Homer Kelley.

Thanks for posting the link!

Kevin

With all due respect, that its not consistent with TGM. The writer is entitled to his own views of course but I dont think that presentation should be attributed to Homer in any way.

Geezzzz....the author is an Authorized Instructor of the Golfing Machine. I guess he should give back his certification?

I was afraid of that. I wish him no disrespect, truly. I don't want to get into the details really DG.

Let's just say The Golf Factory is perhaps inspired by Homer but it's publication is not a distillation of Homers work. It's best attributed to it's author. You know like a lot of Daryl's posts or mine for that matter.

Specious
 

"I am a graduate of two Graduate schools with three graduate degrees. I will write a history of the two institutions and it will be true and accurate and no one will object, of course." Isn't that a silly sentiment? My writings would not be authorized by the founders of those institutions. My writing would be my opinion.

DG, what exactly do you really want to say? Is it that any opinion is valid? Not the case. Any opinion is simply an opinion. Facts are stubborn things that exist and do not vanish because of private opinion. Facts do not change because of any opinion. Facts are 3 dimensional, at least.

The Golf Machine is loaded with facts. An AI may have insight and opinion about theses facts and that is interesting and maybe useful but still the fact is that the AI's opinion is not "Authorized by Homer Kelly."

Mr. Blake explains TGM his way. His way is very, very, effective. His bona fides are displayed in his students. I can tell you that I witnessed many people lining up to be taught by Lynn.

Let the AI you mentioned develop his own students and his own site, or you do it for him if you wish.

Reading your posts lead me to believe you are very skillful regarding golf. Do you have a site celebrating and promoting your understanding? Do you give lessons? I would think you could really help a person golf more effectively. If you start a site, I will read it from time to time and I'm sure I will learn things. :)

ICT

Golfer friendly?
 

I spent several hours a day with Lynn for four days. I have an artificial hip and uneven leg length that effects my every step. All three of my kids grew-up walking with a limp because they thought they were supposed to walk as their dad walked. I had to convince each one in turn they could walk like their mother.

Lynn, reformed my swing effectively throughout the bag. Lynn was friendly and easy to understand and his teachings were and are easy to implement. Lynn gave me much more than I gave him :golf:

You seem to want to start a debate or continue one. As you kick up dust you will mislead and discourage people from learning from Lynn for your own reasons causing them maybe to give up this great game. :naughty:

My opinion is that you should build your own program or front for your AI on another site. You should be respectful to the owner of this site and not take back-hand slaps at such a generous, hard-working, and skillful person.

ICT

No, he should keep his Certification IF he attended the two day lecture and passed the open-book exam and continues to pay Annual Dues.

But....... he should return the Decoder Ring and Cape and if he attended classes before June 1st and received the Bonus Dance Lesson coupons at graduation, he should return any unused portion. :)

Yes, with the golfing machine there is no room for opinion only facts, more importantly the Truth. The above respondes don't surprise me.

me neither