[birdie_man]

My message has been consistent. Why then, is there any perception to the contrary?

There is no mystery:

To serve his own agenda, one self-avowed "competitor" has assigned me the uncompromising doctrine "Head dead still and precisely between the feet." Homer and I get one location in time and space, and he gets everywhere else. Ridiculous.

So, your quote above is not true, and if you want to know exactly where I stand on this G.O.L.F. subject -- or any other for that matter -- then read my posts. All 4,000 some-odd of them. My positions are there, clearly-stated and available at the click of your mouse.

Meanwhile, beware the self-serving misrepresentations of another.

But that's a lot of reading to do...

If it were this simple all the while.....why all the confusion.....it would've been all pretty easy to clear up if you just said this was all a misunderstanding and we just pigeon holed you in some wrong way....no?

I mean....maybe you said it....but man if that's the case you need make that clear (as many times as it takes)....(at the top of your lungs)....maybe I missed it...maybe it got lost in the debate.....I dunno.

...

There are 2 things in my mind:

-what you advocate (and is only one thing, all the time?)
-and why? (including how it works and why it works)

The first needs to be clear....and the second is the part that is more debateable.

My guess is that the other teacher thinks it's important enough to continue bringing up.

Homer Kelley was all about golfers on golf courses, not golfers in the lab.

Not sure I understand. Homer learned a lot in his "lab"....it's not irrelevant in the least.

Are you suggesting then that we should consider "what just works better?" (on the course)

That's one thing to consider of course....but you can't ignore principle either. (which I'm sure you'd agree with)