LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - The Tomasello Argument
View Single Post
  #68  
Old 12-14-2006, 11:00 AM
ChangeMySwing ChangeMySwing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 66
Originally Posted by powerdraw
daniell, could you give us a summary of how Evershed explains it, sometimes 2 stones are aiming the same target, one stone is easier to throw for one person than the other. I mean, it might be two feels or descriptions for the same purpose.
thanks, i still love this thread guyz.
Mark Evershed’s Knowledge Video:


Mark divides the swing into six parts:

Quiet Body: Creates a stable base for the arms and hands
Faults: fat/ thin shots

Educated Hands: Creates speed
Fault: lack of distance

On-Plane Arms: Accuracy secondary power source
Fault: sprayed shots

Square Stance: all of the above faults

Sequence: The combination of all of the above components.
Fault: Pulled shots for low handicap players; sprayed shots for high handicap players.

Ball Position: Allows the on-plane arms to square the club face.
Fault: shots that deviate to whether the ball is too far forward or back.

Evershed’s focal point of the swing is the right hand instead of the magic of the right forearm(inevitably you are using the right forearm). He focuses on the bent back motion of the right hand and maintaining this position throughout the swing. Mark’s swing is more aligned with the pattern that is showed in TT’s Australian Series, but he never mentions the use of the right arm karate chop motion that TT mentions. Think forearm slap instead of a karate chop (Maximum Participation Stroke--- Ben Doyle says YES)

Last edited by ChangeMySwing : 12-14-2006 at 12:05 PM.
Reply With Quote