LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - The Tomasello Argument Thread: The Tomasello Argument View Single Post #1 11-15-2006, 01:08 AM Delaware Golf Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 773 The Tomasello Argument I have often wondered where Tom Tomasello came up with the comments in his 1991 Golf Illustrated interview where he says... Tomasello: Yes. The delayed hit is merely keeping the right wrist bent through impact. All that stuff about leading the downswing with a lateral move of the lower body, driving the hips and legs toward the target to retain power--it's all terribly wrong! It seems to be what's happening, but it's not really what happens in the most efficient, centifugal-force swing there is no forward motion by any part of the body. There are just the two "force vectors" I've described. To say "leading the downswing with a lateral move of the lower body, driving the hips and legs toward the target to retain power--it's all terribly wrong!" That's a pretty bold statement...however, I was reading the seventh edition over the weekend and discovered the last paragraph of 2-N-O had been revised...after reading this section I'm starting to understand where the comments from Tomasello may have come from... Last paragraph of 2-N-O. Proper Clubhead control is dependent on coordinationg the complete Hip Turn with the selected Right Elbow Position (10-3), Motion (6-B-1), and Path (7-3) to avoid collisions as well as for Balance and Axis Tilt. (See 7-15.) To accomplish both the Backstroke and Downstroke must be executed as 7-3, 10-3 and 10-5-0 discuss that procedure." After listening to my private lesson tapes with Tomasello over the last few months, I have come to the conclusion that in no way was Tomasello trying to reinvent TGM. It's interesting that the above statement from Homer references 7-3....Magic of the Right Forearm??? DG Last edited by Delaware Golf : 11-15-2006 at 01:10 AM. Delaware Golf View Public Profile Send a private message to Delaware Golf Find all posts by Delaware Golf