LynnBlakeGolf Forums - View Single Post - Finchem words of wisdom tend to spell trouble
View Single Post
  #1  
Old 09-17-2007, 03:15 AM
Seanmx's Avatar
Seanmx Seanmx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cork, Ireland
Posts: 178
Finchem words of wisdom tend to spell trouble
Finchem words of wisdom tend to spell trouble
JOHN HUGGAN
SOME people call it the PGA Tour commissioner's state of the union address. Others like to think of it as Tim Finchem reaching out to the masses from the mountaintop. I refer to the former Washington lobbyist's annual press conference prior to the season-ending Tour Championship as comedy hour. Not that he's funny as such: the laughter is mostly of the ironic variety.

Truly, no-one in the history of golf has spouted more nonsense than the man that many rate the most powerful in the sport. And this year, in attempting to defend the near-farce that have been the month-long Fed-Ex Cup play-offs that conclude today in Atlanta, he has had the perfect opportunity to spout even more gibberish. The man lives on his little fantasy island where hype and remorseless spin are his twin gods.

Try this for size: "We're pleased by the support the players have given the play-offs, in particular, and the Fed-Ex Cup throughout the year." Would these be the play-offs in which Tiger Woods, Ernie Els, Padraig Harrington, Phil Mickelson and KJ Choi have skipped one of the four available weeks? They would.

How about: "If you were to ask me, as you have, what are you thinking about doing, I sort of categorise it in three buckets." Yes, buckets. And no, I don't have any idea what he's on about.

While it is easy to make fun of the verbally-manipulative Finchem, the danger he presents to golf in the wider sense should not be underestimated. He thinks "outward looking" means anywhere inside the US. Hence his utter indifference when it was pointed out to him the damage the Fed-Ex Cup would almost certainly do to, for example, a suddenly star-starved European Tour.

"This so-called special relationship between Great Britain and the United States in all things doesn't seem to exist in golf," says BBC commentator Peter Alliss. "As much a politician as Tim Finchem is, I'm not sure he really cares about the European Tour. If we went under, I'm not sure it would register on his radar. He's always squeezing dates. The Ryder Cup is moving farther and farther back. All it will take is a bit of mist in the morning, and they won't get the next couple played in three days.

"He doesn't really seem to care. He's always going on about playing against the rest of the world, but only on his own terms. I remember when Greg Norman was going to start a so-called world tour. Finchem killed that, then virtually copied what Greg was proposing.

"I'm concerned that, if you were in a sinking ship with Finchem and there was only one lifeboat, you wouldn't get that lifeboat. He'd have it, and you'd go down with the ship. I really don't think he gives a shit. He'd be very apologetic, but at the end of the day he'd be looking after his own."

Finchem cannot be blamed for attempting to inject some variety into the tedium of the PGA Tour. Courses are pretty much the same as the week before and the week after, hence the one-dimensionality of so much play. And the rapid dwindling of viewing figures.

"The US Tour is a bit like going to see The Mousetrap every week, and going across the road from the theatre to eat the same meal," Alliss, a former Ryder Cup player, observes. "No matter how good the play is or the food is, you soon get bored with it. I know the counter-argument is that Finchem is not obliged to look at the bigger picture: he is employed solely to make money for his members, something he does very well. Look at the bonus system they have for making cuts. If Tiger were to retire when he is 40, he'd get some ridiculous sum of money.

"But for Finchem, the state of the game is neither here nor there. He is responsible for providing tournaments for his members to play in. I didn't think he could continue to find sponsors willing to put up a $1m first prize every week, but he has."

What has also boosted sympathy for Finchem's latest cause is the whining from players, most notably Mickelson, whenever the unavailability of the Fed-Ex prize-money is mentioned. The pampered souls will receive the cash only when they reach the age of 45.

"Professional golf has come so far in a relatively short period of time that I wonder how much longer it can go on and on," says Alliss. "The reaction of some of the players worries me. I never thought I would say there is too much money in professional golf. But I'm beginning to think there is. The top players are seemingly not tempted by anything. The Fed-Ex is worth $10m, and it can't get them to play every week. Money just does not stir them."

A suggestion: pay the money when players start behaving like 45-year-olds. Now that would really make me laugh.

This article: http://sport.scotsman.com/golf.cfm?id=1482102007
__________________
Reverse every natural instinct and do the opposite of what you are inclined to do, and you will probably come very close to having a perfect golf swing.

Ben Hogan
Reply With Quote