[hg]

...Regarding my modus operandi of attacking any golf swing theory, it merely reflects my scientific approach established over many decades. I find that the best way to understand a scientific theory and assess its "falsifiability factor" is to attack and analyse it from every possible angle. If it withstands rigorous analysis, then my admiration for its "low falsifiability" factor increases, and I respect it much more. So, don't be offended. Instead, you should realize that my inability to find flaws in Hk's theory actually strenghtens his theory in a way that you would not realise if his theory was not repeatedly dissected and analysed and criticized by me, and many other critics.

Jeff.

For those of us who appreciate your insights and who share the same scientific approach to analysis please continue to ask questions and offer your own insights & contributions. Homer would have loved the debate and probably would have participated with great enthusiasm. What is so great about this FORUM is the latitude given to diverse opinions as long as it is kept civil and conducted with integrity and in a gentlemenly fashion. Do not be discouraged by those who only offer criticism. If participating in this FORUM required degrees in science and engineering and/or a Zero Handicap, few of us would be members, including HK.