I didn't just introduce an isolated bloke's swing (Sergio Garcia's swing) out of context. I used Sergio Garcia as an example of another plane theory - Hank Haney's theory of conguent plane angles. Whether you regard Hank Haney's plane theory as being as "scientific" as HK's plane theory is a personal choice, but I don't think that I am being "destructive" or "unnecessarily disrespectful of HK" by comparing HK's plane theory to other plane theories (Hank Haney's). I think that we all can learn by dissecting/comparing golf swing theories.
Jeff.
Jeff,
The introduction of your ad hoc examples is not the issue. The issue, for me, is that I find it difficult at times to understand your motives in doing so.
Often it seems, to me, that you are more intent on proving your own theories with these "evidential" examples, than furthering your own understanding of the concept in question - i.e usually your own question.
Finally, a Plane is a Plane, is a Plane. But, congruency must be avoided at all costs. At least that's my understanding.
Threaded Mode
