Second Selection:[list=1][*]The player originally picked goat 1. The door with goat 2 is revealed. The remaining door has the car.
Correct
Quote:
[*]The player originally picked goat 2. The door with goat 1 is revealed. The remaining door has the car.
Correct
Quote:
The player originally picked the car. The door with goat 1 is revealed. The remaining door has goat 2.
The player originally picked the car. The door with goat 2 is revealed. The remaining door has goat 1.
Chances of switching and selecting the car: 2 in 4 (1 in 2)
Nope - there is only 1 car behind the doors not two....
Just because there are four permutations of what can occur doesn't mean you have four choices. It really doesn't matter if you eliminate goat 1 or goat 2 when you have picked the car. If you switch, you will lose either way....
Just because there are four permutations of what can occur doesn't mean you have four choices. It really doesn't matter if you eliminate goat 1 or goat 2 when you have picked the car. If you switch, you will lose either way....
Then what are the odds of switching and getting goat 1?
When the door is opened to reveal a goat, that choice is not random. There's always a goat behind one of those doors for them to show you and they only choose after you have chosen. So, that has no bearing on the initial conditions. The probability that you did not pick the car with your first pick is 2/3 and that does not change.
It's been fun, but the snow is starting to melt and it's time to start thinking golf. I'll admit I was already familiar with this problem and its "correct" answer a long time ago (I think it was in a column by Marilyn vos Savant), but it's still fun to argue the "wrong" side of an argument. Sorry I couldn't challenge you more.
It's been fun, but the snow is starting to melt and it's time to start thinking golf. I'll admit I was already familiar with this problem and its "correct" answer a long time ago (I think it was in a column by Marilyn vos Savant), but it's still fun to argue the "wrong" side of an argument. Sorry I couldn't challenge you more.
Cheers.
Thats cool
Maybe I should keep this going...
Heres another probability problem
What is the chances of being dealt the Ace of spades and the Ace of diamonds when playing texas hold'em?
Say after the flop comes with 3 spades showing. What is the chances of making a flush with the turn card, the river card and both?
Lets say there were $2500 in the pot preflop and your opponent moves all in after the flop and has you covered, and you have $2100 left. Would calling this bet be profitable over the long run?
Not that familiar with Hold 'em, so I'll sit this hand out. Just to finish up on Monty, here is what I consider to be the correct rundown of the probabilities: (My previous "flawed" argument conveniently excluded possibilities #4 and #6.)
The player originally picked the car. The door with goat 1 is revealed. The remaining door has goat 2. (1/6)
The player originally picked the car. The door with goat 2 is revealed. The remaining door has goat 1. (1/6)
The player originally picked goat 1. The door with goat 2 is revealed. The remaining door has the car. (2/6)
The player originally picked goat 1. The door with the car is revealed. The remaining door has goat 2. (0/6)
(Rules don’t allow this option, so probability of #3 outcome is doubled.)
The player originally picked goat 2. The door with goat 1 is revealed. The remaining door has the car. (2/6)
The player originally picked goat 2. The door with the car is revealed. The remaining door has goat 1. (0/6)
(Rules don’t allow this option, so probability of #5 outcome is doubled.)